SMED: Reduce Changeover Time and Batch Sizes

Intermediate 9 min read · Updated 2026-10-31

Long changeovers lead to large batches, and large batches lead to high inventory and long lead times. SMED reduces changeover time systematically, usually without any up-front investment. This lesson shows the four steps and uses three examples to calculate how a shorter changeover affects effective cycle time, batch size, EPEI and inventory.

What SMED is

SMED stands for Single Minute Exchange of Die, meaning a die change in single-digit minutes. The method goes back to Shigeo Shingo, who developed it from the 1950s onward, at Toyota among others. The goal is not to work more frantically, but a changeover sequence in which the machine stops only for the steps that truly require it to be stopped.

Changeover time is the time from the last good part of the old batch to the first good part of the new batch at normal speed. Start-up, trial parts and readjustment are included, not just the physical swap. In the data box it appears as C/O (changeover) in minutes.

Internal and external setup

Internal setup is everything that can only be done with the machine stopped: removing and installing the die, clamping, adjusting, running a trial part. External setup runs in parallel with production: fetching and preheating the die, staging material, preparing clamps and gauges, loading programs, cleaning up after the changeover.

In many current-state changeovers the two are mixed: the machine sits idle while someone searches for the die or waits for the crane. This is exactly where SMED starts. For the value stream only internal setup counts, because that is the only time the machine loses capacity.

The four steps

Separating and converting cost little and often deliver most of the savings. Investment in clamping technology usually pays off only in the streamline step.

Changeover per piece in the data box

Effective cycle time accounts for changeovers through changeover time per piece: changeover time ÷ batch size. Uptime in the data box covers breakdowns only, so changeovers are not counted twice.

Example stamping in the steering bracket map: cycle time 1 s, uptime 85%, changeover 60 min, batch size 1,000. Changeover per piece = 3,600 s ÷ 1,000 = 3.6 s, effective cycle time = 1 ÷ 0.85 + 3.6 = 4.8 s. With SMED down to 10 min (the kaizen burst in the demo) it is 600 s ÷ 1,000 = 0.6 s and 1.8 s effective.

You can use the time gained in two ways: as capacity (same batch size, less changeover per piece) or for more frequent changeovers (smaller batches, same changeover per piece). With a 10 min changeover and 167 pcs per batch, changeover per piece stays at 3.6 s, but one batch now covers only about 0.2 of a day’s demand instead of a little more than one day (920 pcs). For the value stream the second option is usually the goal, because smaller batches mean less inventory.

Changeover per piece = changeover time (s) ÷ batch size effective C/T = C/T ÷ uptime ÷ performance ÷ (1 − scrap) + changeover ÷ batch size

Example pump assembly: changeover creates the bottleneck

In the pump assembly exercise, takt time is 450 min × 60 ÷ 300 pcs = 90 s. Machining has a 75 s cycle time, 85% uptime, 40 min changeover and a batch size of 150. Changeover per piece: 2,400 s ÷ 150 = 16 s, effective 75 ÷ 0.85 + 16 = 104.2 s. The process is above takt even though its plain cycle time is below it.

SMED to 10 min plus TPM to 95% uptime: at half the batch size (75 pcs), changeover costs 600 s ÷ 75 = 8 s per piece, effective 75 ÷ 0.95 + 8 = 86.9 s, so below takt. At the same time the batch inventory after the process is cut in half.

Without SMED the smaller batch would hurt: 2,400 s ÷ 75 pcs = 32 s per piece, 120.2 s effective at 85% uptime. Only the shorter changeover makes small batches possible. To work through it yourself: /learn/value-stream-mapping-exercise/

Changeover time, batch size and EPEI

When several variants share a machine, changeover time determines how often each variant can run. The time left after production is the changeover capacity. EPEI (Every Part Every Interval) is the sum of the changeover times for one cycle through all variants, divided by this changeover capacity per day.

Example milling in the template “Variant production”: 450 min working time × 80% uptime = 21,600 s. Load: 400 × 28 s + 250 × 24 s + 50 × 55 s = 19,950 s. Changeover capacity: 21,600 − 19,950 = 1,650 s, or 27.5 min per day. Changeover times of the three variants: 45 + 45 + 90 = 180 min = 10,800 s. EPEI = 10,800 ÷ 1,650 = 6.5 days.

With SMED on the special variant (90 → 30 min) the total drops to 120 min = 7,200 s, and EPEI to 7,200 ÷ 1,650 = 4.4 days. One batch per variant equals roughly daily demand × EPEI, and average batch inventory is about half a batch. For the standard variant (400 pcs per day) this means the batch drops from about 2,600 to about 1,750 pcs, and the average coverage of the batch inventory from about 3.3 to 2.2 days.

Changeover capacity per day = working time × uptime − Σ (demand × cycle time) EPEI = Σ changeover times ÷ changeover capacity per day Batch size per variant ≈ daily demand × EPEI
Milling is 92% loaded, at 19,950 of 21,600 s. With changeover capacity this tight, every minute of changeover has a strong effect on EPEI. On a machine with plenty of spare time EPEI is short anyway; there, habit and changeover effort are more likely to limit the batch size.

Planning SMED in the value stream

On the current state map, changeover problems show up in three places: a high C/O in the data box, large inventory after the process and an EPEI of several days or weeks. In the future state, SMED is usually the prerequisite for a supermarket with kanban and small batches; without a shorter changeover the supermarket gets large.

In the app, enter the action as a kaizen burst on the process, with owner and due date. In the future state, change changeover time and batch size in the data box and adjust the inventories to the new batch size. Effective cycle time, EPEI (via the product mix if there are several products), coverage and lead time are recalculated; the current/future comparison shows the effect.

In OEE, changeovers count against availability. So SMED raises OEE availability, while uptime in the data box (breakdowns only) stays the same. More on this: /learn/oee-epei-product-mix/

Practice in the editor

Open “Variant production”, check the EPEI for milling in the product mix and reduce the changeover of the special variant (“Sonder”) there from 90 to 30 min. Compare EPEI and changeover capacity before and after.

Open the template in the editor Start blank

Free, no sign-up, in your browser. Metrics, timeline and checks are calculated automatically.

Frequently asked questions

What does SMED mean?

Single Minute Exchange of Die: changeovers in single-digit minutes, so under ten minutes. The method comes from Shigeo Shingo. It describes a direction and a procedure, not a fixed limit for every machine.

What is the difference between internal and external setup?

Internal setup can only be done with the machine stopped (changing the die, adjusting, trial part). External setup happens while the machine is still running the old batch or already running the new one (staging the die, presetting, cleaning up). Only internal setup costs capacity.

Does changeover time belong in the uptime in the data box?

No. Uptime in the data box covers breakdowns only. Changeovers are accounted for in effective cycle time through changeover time ÷ batch size. In OEE, by contrast, changeovers count against availability.

Is SMED worth it if the machine is not a bottleneck?

Yes, if you use the time gained for smaller batches. Batch inventory, coverage and lead time then go down, even if capacity was already sufficient. If you only cut changeover time and keep the batch size, you gain spare capacity but no inventory reduction.

How do I measure changeover time correctly?

From the last good part of the old batch to the first good part of the new batch at normal speed. Start-up, trial parts and readjustment are included. Record several changeovers, because changeover times vary a lot.

Self-test

1. Which step is part of external setup?
Staging and presetting can be done while the machine is still producing. Unclamping and the trial part require the machine to be stopped.
2. Changeover 30 min, batch size 300. What is the changeover time per piece?
30 min = 1,800 s; 1,800 s ÷ 300 pcs = 6 s per piece.
3. Changeover drops from 60 to 10 min, batch size from 1,000 to 167 pcs. What happens to changeover per piece?
3,600 s ÷ 1,000 = 3.6 s and 600 s ÷ 167 ≈ 3.6 s. The saving lies in the smaller batch and therefore lower inventory.
4. How does a shorter changeover affect EPEI?
EPEI = Σ changeover times ÷ changeover capacity per day. If the numerator goes down, EPEI goes down.
5. Where do you capture changeover losses in the data box?
Uptime in the data box contains breakdowns only; changeovers enter effective cycle time as changeover time ÷ batch size.

Keep learning